h1

A Little Bit of Fission

June 3, 2012

One of the fun things you can do with uranium is to turn big atoms into little atoms.  All natural heavy nuclei will undergo fission after a hard enough kick (for instance, protons accelerated to around 50 MeV will fission gold or bismuth), but to split uranium, all you need are some household-variety neutrons.  Offering a neutron to a U-235 or U-238 nucleus is like giving Mr. Creosote his “wafer-thin mint” in the infamous Monty Python sketch: the recipient is violently blown to chunks and the surroundings drenched in postprandial gibbage!  Maybe I’ve gone overboard with that metaphor.  Anyhow, uranium fission residues include a long list of mostly-radioactive lighter nuclei, additional prompt and delayed neutrons, and some gamma rays.

25 grams of uranyl peroxide in a Nalgene bottle, ready to be irradiated with neutrons.

The 2-4 Ci PuBe source used to irradiate the uranium sample.  A string is provided for safe handling.

The experiment described here relates to the question of what specific fission product gamma signatures a nuclear hobbyist, equipped with typically limited resources, is likely to observe pursuant to neutron irradiation of some natural uranium.  Preliminary considerations suggest we’ll only notice products that emit strong gamma radiation, have a half-life comparable to or shorter than the irradiation period, and have high fission yields.  Uranium’s natural radioactivity causes additional complication, probably blinding us to fission products that emit at energies near the major features of the Pa-234 spectrum.  Beyond these generalities, predicting what we might see is a nontrivial task, so the question can really only be addressed convincingly by experiment.

Neutron source and uranium are lowered into a wax moderator.

_ at the University of _ kindly offered his HPGe detector for use in this experiment.

I irradiated 25 grams of natural uranyl peroxide, freshly prepared from Utah pitchblende ore, overnight with a ~5E+06 n/s PuBe neutron source.  This source intensity is comparable to contemporary hobby fusion neutron sources, like well-constructed Farnsworth fusors.  After irradiation, a 2.5-hour gamma spectrum of the sample was collected with an HPGe detector.  25g of non-irradiated uranyl peroxide in an identical container served as a control, the spectrum of the control being subtracted from the spectrum of the irradiated sample to eliminate most features belonging to uranium or its own decay daughters.  What we’re left with is a difference spectrum containing features attributable to the nuclear transmutations in the irradiated sample.  Here’s that gamma spectrum, in three graphs, encompassing the range of 200-1500 keV.  I have labelled the identified peaks.

So what did we make?  Here’s a summary of the nuclides contributing peaks found in the gamma spectrum, with my comments on a few.  All are short-lived, having half-lives between 30 minutes and 2.4 days.

  • Np-239: The largest new peaks in the above spectra are the ones at 229 and 278 keV belonging to Np-239, which is formed not by fission but by (n,g) neutron capture on U-238 followed by beta decay of U-239.  Np-239 is the parent of the important fissile isotope, Pu-239.
  • Sr-92: Although not the largest new activity, Sr-92′s peak at 1384 keV is the most prominent above background.
  • I-135 and Xe-135: These are high-yield fission products, Xe-135 being the daughter of I-135, having huge neutron cross-sections, responsible for effects known variously as “xenon poisoning” and the “iodine well” in nuclear reactor behavior.
  • Sr-91 and Y-91m: Sr-91 is a high-yield fission product; Y-91m is not, but grows in as Sr-91 decays.
  • Zr-97, Nb-97, and Nb-97m
  • I-133
  • I-134
  • Cs-138
  • La-142

If you’re doing a fission experiment with a very weak source of neutrons, and your irradiation time is on the order of at least a few hours, I recommend you first set your sights on Sr-92′s whopping peak out at 1384 keV.  If you can’t see that one, you probably won’t see anything else.  Xe-135 and the iodine isotopes might be easy to separate from an aqueous uranium solution by solvent extraction with corn oil or some similar nonpolar medium, improving their visibility against background.

More writeup on this experiment here.

Many thanks to _ at the University of _ for the use of some of his resources.

14 comments

  1. Thanks, it’s nice to see some good gamma-ray spectrum work; a bit nostalgic for me these days.


    • Hi Bill, I appreciate your interest as always. I have a couple other spectroscopy tidbits to finish posting, but I’m pretty slow and irregular with the blog.


  2. Nice experiment! I just wonder how you build your neutron source… Pu seems to be a hard-to-find stuff…


    • You’re right, Pu is hard to find! This PuBe source was commercially manufactured by Monsanto and its owner is properly licensed. They generously let me use it overnight for this experiment.


  3. Very Good Fission Demonstration. Thank you for sharing it.
    I always thought that in order to see traces of Fission Products, some Enrichment will be necessary, never thought that with Natural Uranium Could be done. By the way is it Legal in the US to possess 25 grams of Natural Yellow Cake ? or a license from the NRC is necessary ?


    • Hi Al, you could probably do this with depleted uranium. I’m sure a significant fraction of the fission comes from U-238(n,f) with neutrons in excess of ~0.8 MeV. No specific license is necessary to possess “unimportant quantities of source material” (such as yellowcake); I believe the current 10 CFR bag limit (as we call it) is 15 lb for educational uses but anyone reading this would be wise to check on that number. Thanks for your interest.


      • Wise indeed…

        The statute is actually under 10 CFR § 40.22 “Small quantities of source material.”

        Unimportant is in § 40.13 and the amounts/activities are quite small.

        “10 CFR § 40.13 Unimportant quantities of source material.

        (Redacted for length by Carl Willis. We can all find the regulation text online if interested)


  4. would a 500microcurie Po-210 beryllium source be enough to cause fission? Would it be safe to use in activation and fission experiments, and how much shielding would it require.


    • I presume you intend to use the Po source in contact with beryllium to generate neutrons. Commercially available Po sources are sealed, making them very safe. 500 microcuries will only get you a couple hundred neutrons per second in a well-designed PoBe source using a sealed alpha source; 5 millicuries in a Nuclespot is ten times more activity for less than twice the price. But the other aspect of detecting fission is the detection system: gamma spectroscopy, neutrons, etc. Its abilities will determine the minimum statistically detectable source rate or activity you can detect from the fission process.


      • I was thinking about leasing one of those nuclepsot sources. And for a spectroscopy system could i use a spectrum techniques Gamma spectrometer. Or could i borrow a Berkeley Nucleonics Corp Portable isotope identifier with a big lead shield around it. I don’t have one from spectrum techniques yet but im thinking of getting one, but i have ready access to any radiation detectors and isotope identifiers from BNC.


  5. or should i lease one of those 5millicurie polonium Nuclespot static eliminators.


  6. Hey Carl I was wondering about he regulations on a Nuclespot 5mCi source. I was also wondering about the legalities of irradiating uranium because of the production of plutonium which the NRC takes very seriously. I heard of a Swedish man named Richard handl who got arrested after trying to irradiate a uranium glass marble with a makeshift americium radium beryllium source. Do I need any special licenses to irradiate uranium?

    -Aldo


    • The Nuclespot is subject to an NRC General License, the most important stipulation of which is that you cannot disassemble or damage it. Using it in a hobby neutron source to make a few nuclei of plutonium isn’t something that is likely to arouse any regulatory concern; keep in mind that natural uranium is irradiated by natural neutrons all the time (from cosmic radiation and from its own spontaneous fission). It’s not like this is a source of licenseable quantities of byproduct material, like a reactor or an accelerator facility might be.


      • what should i use to slow down the neutrons so they can be captured. I already have a few bricks of Borated Paraffin.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 78 other followers

%d bloggers like this: